Why do “Progressives” support Islamists?

Liberals, Progressives, and Democrats support Islamists who would gladly anally inspect Liberals, Progressives and Democrats. Go finger, er, figure . . .

Posted in In the "Mainstream", Internet, Liberalism, Obamacare, Political Ads, Socialism | Leave a comment

The corn looks like his future . . .

Posted in Liberalism | Leave a comment

Paul Ryan, good pick or not?

If one wasn’t lucky enough to be having a root canal or a tire rotation since the announcement of Paul Ryan to breath life into the Romney campaign, one probably suffered through the myriad chatters speculating on the strengths and weaknesses Mr. Ryan brings.

Ironically, very few noticed or commented on the obvious, to wit: The campaign for weeks has been about the past. It has been crude and dishonest. And, it has been on Mr. Obama’s turf – well, beneath it actually – in the gutter.

Now with the addition of Mr. Ryan, the campaign will be about the future, the enormous and increasing financial burden we face, and how Mr. Obama’s policies have made our problems dire. And, as an added bonus, Obamacare remains bad medicine and Mr. Ryan is the right doctor to cure it. Just remember the rectal exam he gave Mr. Obama in six minutes of pure pleasure for sentient beings.

We “know” that Mr. Romney didn’t pay taxes for 10 years, an indictment of the Internal Revenue Service and Dingy Harry Reid. We know that a woman’s death, seven years after Mr. Obama left Bain Capital, five years after her husband lost his job and took a cash buyout, and three years after she quit her own job and abandoned her own health insurance is on Mitt Romney. And, we know that Ann Romney had a horse competing in Olympic dressage that didn’t medal! We know these distractions, advanced by Mr. Obama’s friends in the mainstream media are irrelevant. Let the games begin.

 

Posted in Capitalism, In the "Mainstream", Liberalism, Obamacare, Political Ads, Socialism, Taxation, The Affordable Care Act | Tagged | Leave a comment

Barry Hussein Soetoro Obama wants to be your keeper . . .

But not his brother’s. George Hussein Obama could use some of the love Mr. President is spreading around with our children and grand-children’s inheritance.

It’s a tossup: Is George better off than Aunt Zeituni? Neither seems to get the love Barry has for us . . .

Posted in Internet, Liberalism, Obamacare, Political Ads | Tagged | Leave a comment

If Vietnam is your destination . . .

We can’t think of one good reason to go to Vietnam . . . except maybe to confirm the heroics of John Kerry, the French-looking Senator from Massachusetts who served in Vietnam and didn’t drive a woman to her death at Chappaquiddick.

However, if called upon to make the journey, we will gladly fly Vietjetair.

Posted in Liberalism | Leave a comment

Allen West wasn’t content to be an American hero in war . . .

Allen West is now an American hero in peace, a man for our times, a gem. Here is is response to the uninformed ignoramuses otherwise known as “Journalists.”

For evidence of the fear and loathing he fosters in the “Progressive” movement, watch this despicable ad.

Posted in In the "Mainstream", Internet, Liberalism, Political Ads | Tagged | Leave a comment

Michael Kinsley is off his meds . . .

In an astonishingly illogical argument, even for Michael Kinsley, he feebly tries to make a case that the patently false Joe Soptic pro Obama commercial is not just true, but that it doesn’t go far enough in impugning Mitt.

Kinsley:

The ad is certainly tough and effective, but is it dishonest? It does not accuse Romney of murder. It does accuse him of indirect responsibility for a woman’s death. It says that because the woman’s husband lost his job and his health insurance when Bain Capital bought his company and closed his plant, the woman was slow to get medical care when she started feeling ill, and as a result was diagnosed with stage four cancer — terminal — when she finally sought help. She died shortly thereafter.

Kinsley combines so many untruths in this brief paragraph one could be excused for believing Barry Hussein Soetoro Obama wrote it himself.  Let’s start with, “bought his company and closed his plant . . .” Bain Capital funded GS Technologies which became GST Steel Company and bought Armco Worldwide Grinding Systems is 1993. The plant failed in 2001 and was liquidated. And, even though Progressives are innumerate, eight years can hardly constitute “bought  . . and closed” in any rational context.  Further, in 1997 the plant sustained a 10-week strike, no-doubt participated in by Joe Soptic and that no-doubt crippled the failing plant in a failing industry.  Finally of course is the notion that an investor has a duty to continue funding a losing enterprise merely to maintain employment and presumably health insurance.  So obviously Kinsley must be a Marxist, the ideator who gave us communism and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the U.S.S.R. and its success. Oh, right. It lies athwart the slag-heap of history.

Kinsley:

Critics say that when her husband was let go, the woman still had health insurance through her own employer, but lost it when she had to quit her own job due to unrelated medical problems. Well, so what? Any story like this is going to involve a series of misfortunes. It remains true that but for Bain’s decision to close the plant, she would have been covered by her husband’s insurance.

This argument from Kinsley exceeds stupidity by some orders of magnitude!  Ranae Soptic left her job voluntarily with full knowledge that her husband was uninsured and earning $15,000 a year as a custodian, a long fall from his steelworker wages of $46,000. It may have been an unfortunate choice, but it was her free will. And the “unrelated medical problems” Kinsley refers to? Headaches!  So, her choice to resolve “medical problems” was to abandon her health insurance. That is beyond stupid. Oh, inquiring minds want to know: Was Ranae a smoker?

Kinsley:

By the time the plant was closed, Romney was no longer in charge of day-to-day decisions at Bain. Again, so what? He still had overall responsibility for the company. He wants credit as a brilliant entrepreneur for his time at Bain. If a decision to close a plant and lay off hundreds of workers was considered so minor as to be unworthy of his attention, that says something about Romney and the culture he built at the company. Maybe layoffs were essential, or at least a good idea. But a good corporate leader should at least have had input on a decision that everyone knows will cause pain.

Here, Kinsley must be making a pathetic attempt at humor. He can’t possibly be serious.  If he is, it is an indictment of Barry Hussein Soetoro Obama that calls for more than removal – it calls for criminal indictment, conviction and execution. If Mitt isn’t distant from Bain two years after leaving to run the Salt Lake City Olympics; if Mitt is responsible for every executive decision in a portfolio of many company investments; if Mitt will be held to account, it is your duty to remember Nidal Malik Hasan, a general officer in the United States Army, the same army for which Mr. Obama is Commander in Chief, a Constitutional duty far greater than a mere private sector chief executive. Mr. Obama was, and still is, Colonel Hasan’s superior officer, directly responsible for his failings and felonies.

Kinsley:

It is uncontested that lack of insurance is what killed this woman.

What?!  Damn, we thought medical care was the best prescription to remedy illness. Little did we know that death can be prevented not by good health care, but rather by buying insurance.  Maybe the Progressives are right. And, eat your broccoli.

Sadly, the Romney brain-trust, as amoebic as it is, will not fight back against these sub-human assaults, instead contentedly reminding us of what we know – Mr. Obama’s economy is weak.  Duh!

Posted in Capitalism, In the "Mainstream", Liberalism, Obamacare, Political Ads, The Affordable Care Act | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

President Obama plumbs new depths …

UPDATE: Even the Clinton News Network finds the Joe Soptic ad false!

It has long been thought that the most despicable advertisement ever run in a presidential campaign, and perhaps any campaign, even for the proverbial “dog catcher,” was “Daisy.”

Unsurprisingly it was run in 1964 by the Democrat, Lyndon Baines Obama, er, Johnson against Conservative candidate Barry Goldwater, a haberdasher from Arizona. Okay, he was also a prominent Senator.

It ran only one time as opposed to the thousands of times ads run today. But, long before “social media” it benefited from the same phenomenon – it was embraced by the liberal press and media which wrote about its deep philosophical meanings and the distinct possibility that it was a portent into our immediate future. Simply, Goldwater wanted nuclear war!

We hear this tactic repeated often, and embraced by our “objective” journalists. For example, when San Fran Nan Pelosi and Dingy Harry Reid and even President Barry Hussein Soetoro Obama argue that “Republicans want the elderly, autistic children and children with Down syndrome to ‘fend for themselves,’ and that the GOP plan is ‘dirtier air, dirtier water. . . ” it goes largely unchallenged in the mainstream because it is their view too.

But, just as we’re seeing new record high temperatures in our summer season (who’da thunk it?) we’re seeing a new nadir in our silly season from Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama. (For those not in the know, Mr. Obama was Barry Soetoro while a youth attending Madrasah in Indonesia.) In this ad Barry claims that Romney causes cancer and that his actions led directly to the death of Joe Soptic’s wife, Ilyona.  Never mind that when “Ranae” Soptic died in 2006, Romney was governor of Massachusetts. Never mind that she received “health care” even though Joe lost his health insurance – a very different thing, indeed.  Never mind that Joe isn’t claiming he was financially ruined from her 22 day hospitalization, suggesting that he wasn’t – other insureds paid for Ranae’s medical care.  Never mind that Joe only speculates that Ranae may not have sought health care because she was uninsured. In fact, that he fails to make that claim strongly suggests that insurance was not the cause and that he has enough conscience to avoid such an extravagant claim. Never mind that Bain Capital kept Joe’s employer alive for eight years when steel companies were an endangered species in the midst of a colossal industrial restructuring. And, for those who note that it is a Barry Obama supporting Super PAC running this disgusting pile of bovine scatology, and not Barry himself, if Barry holds Mitt responsible for things he did not, Barry will be held to answer too.

Finally, if Mitt’s crew were smart – and that’s a rebuttable presumption – they’d run a counter ad charging Barry with a far larger abuse of “workers’ rights,” the firing of tens of thousands of Chrysler, General Motors and Delphi employees, not to mention the thousands terminated when Barry shuttered some 2,000 auto dealerships, predominately in right-leaning markets. Barry takes great pride in using our tax dollars to save the United Auto Workers at the expense of higher priority bond investors, but largely untold is the cost borne by thousands who were not in the favored unions.

Posted in Capitalism, In the "Mainstream", Liberalism, Political Ads, Socialism, Taxation | Tagged | Leave a comment

Barry Obama killed the Sikhs . . .

The new standard established by the Democrat Party and the Mainstream Media – a subsidiary of the Democrat National Committee – is that when a charge is made it is true until proved false. Harry Reid following in the footsteps none other than Senator Joseph McCarthy (R. WI) has declared that Mitt Romney hasn’t paid any tax in 10 years. He knows, because a mysterious unnamed source has told him so. And no one in the MSM dares ask who.

So, in adopting the new old standard, it is clear that Barack Hussein Obama was aware of the impending domestic, skin-head inspired slaughter of innocent Sikhs. He’s in charge of the government – someone told me.

 

 

Posted in Liberalism | Leave a comment

Jonathan Capehart, Fairy Dusting again . . .

Jonathan Capehart, the Washington Post’s very own Fairy Godfather crafts a classic “Progressive” false argument – a lie if you will – then excoriates his adversary for things not said, not suggested, and not so . . .

In his screed attacking Tom Coburn (R. OK) he first lumps the Senator among “Tea Partyers”  (sic) which he isn’t. Evidence you demand? Senator Coburn was a member of the “Gang of Six” which consisted of three Republicans and three Democrats who agreed to advance a compromise to our budget impasse that included tax increases on the “Rich” – those who actually already pay for the 60% of government spending that isn’t borrowed from the Chicoms. No TEA Partyer even remotely neared said compromise and most were quite aggressive in their criticism of the moderate senator.

In response to Coburn railing against the SEVENTEEN TRILLION DOLLAR national debt, the Fairy Godfather added, “I don’t recall there being a popular uprising over two wars being funded off the books or tax cuts that weren’t paid for.” This is of course, patently false. First, the wars were fully funded on the books – they were just not part of the regular budget process; second, tax cuts are never paid for because the government doesn’t own our income, nor has it collected it; and third and most important, there were Conservatives who opposed reckless federal spending under President Bush and who voted NO!

The weakest of all Fairy dusting was the argument that “Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) was…  making the usual argument you hear from tea partyers. The one that says the federal government has abandoned the Constitution. This concern has always struck [Capehart] as odd  . . . because [he didn’t] recall hearing such overwrought concern during the previous administration.” One needs only to remember the debate over the security measures adopted after the September 11 attacks to appreciate what a load of Fairy Dust this argument is. Many Republicans, principled Conservatives and even a few Liberals ranted and raved about the personal freedoms and civil rights being sacrificed . . . and many still do. It was the Progressives who characteristically embraced the oppressive standards until they didn’t and found most objectionable the reality that when President Bush refused to unionize the Transportation Security workforce, a huge cash windfall evaporated before it could be spent campaigning. They simply put political lucre ahead of national security and consequently got spanked in the 2002 mid-term elections. Look it up.

 

 

falsely claiming that TEA Partyers

Posted in AFSCME, Capitalism, In the "Mainstream", Internet, Liberalism, Socialism, Taxation, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment