Let’s review the Obama scandals in terms that “Progressives,” “Liberals,” and even Democrats can grasp.
Fast and Furious was the first major scandal, still unresolved. It was a plan, hatched by senior Justice Department leaders. The plot was to use straw buyers to purchase lethal weapons, assault rifles if you will, from gun dealers in Arizona and track how they then move through the underground world into Mexican drugs gangs south of the border. But, Justice lost track of the guns, the transporters and the entire hair-brained scheme. The result was U.S. Government supplied killing tools falling into the hand of Mexican supplied killing machines, the deaths of countless Mexicans and the confirmed death of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.
Obama apologists, who have their work cut out, argue that “the Bush Administration did the same thing,” the fourth grader rationale that no parent would accept. And, the Bush Administration did no such thing. It did run a sting, after consulting with the Mexican Government, it never lost track of the guns, not one of them crossed the border, no one was killed or even injured, and it resulted in felony arrests and convictions. In other words, Bush did it right with success while Obama did it wrong with grave consequences.
The Associated Press phone records case, a clear violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution is deeply troubling. The Justice Department and its tools at the Federal Bureau of Investigation through the use of artifice and deceptions secretly tapped twenty phone lines dedicated for use by A.P. reporters in the Capital to communicate privately with their offices, colleagues and most importantly, their “sources” from whom they gain confidential information under the belief that said disclosures are protected, will remain private and about which the reporters cannot be made to divulge sources.
The First Amendment reads so clearly that even Mr. Obama should be able to understand its proscription: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (Emphasis added.)
The James Rosen and FoxNews case although separate from the A.P. case is as serious and more. In this case, Justice filed a false affidavit in a Federal Court alleging that reporter James Rosen was a “co-conspirator” and a “flight-risk” which convinced the judge to issue a subpoena and allow Justice to delve into the private emails and phone records of not just Mr. Rosen, but even his parents! This is truly chilling: Mr. Obama, in pursuit of dubious goals, will lie to a Federal Judge to smite his perceived enemies, in this case, a free and open “fair and balanced” press. The difference between the United States and virtually every other country is an aggressive, free press to assure transparency and participative democracy. Mr. Obama and Vladimir Ilyich Lenin disagree.
The Exempt Organization Division of The Internal Revenue Service, a body of which we have considerable personal knowledge. In this case, Mr. Obama’s apparatchiks systematically denied or delayed lawful recognition of tax exempt organizations through what we call, “The pernicious power of the red check mark.” Federal bureaucrats have enormous power to confuse, crush and even destroy citizens, often without meaningful review or appeal. Thus, they must be scrupulous in their administration of the laws Congress enacts. In this case, through a systematic scheme organizations on the right side of the political spectrum (not to mention the right side of the issues) were denied directly or indirectly to participate in the system as left leaning groups do merely for their political persuasions. The Obama I.R.S. asked unlawful questions, harassed through expensive unlawful document demands, and deliberately delayed or prevented groups from benefitting from the laws similarly situated left wing groups enjoy. The I.R.S. asked such bizarre and unlawful questions as “What was the content of your prayers “from groups that had a religious substance. Again, in violation of the First Amendment which guarantees that the “Congress shall make no law establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . . “
Under former Exempt Organization Division Director Ira Cohen and his deputy, Marty Slate, both left-wing bureaucrats, the division operated with neutrality. Their successors managed the division similarly. Only under Mr. Obama has E.O. violated basic fair dealing. To compound the matter and suggest political chicanery, the I.R.S. Commissioner, Democrat Douglas Shulman visited the White House 157 times in a little more than two years. In contrast, his predecessor in four years visited once because the I.R.S. is supposed to be independent and non-political.
We worked for Presidents Reagan and George Herbert Walker Bush and visited the White House probably 60 or 70 times even while our mother worked directly for THE President, Mr. Reagan. Two visits were official, once to be appointed to The President’s Commission on the Future of the Steel Industry; and a second time to receive an award (including $10,000) from the President for superior service on said commission.
While Fast and Furious was an abomination, the other three scandals should chill even Democrats. If this is the new normal – much like 14% unemployment is our standard – soon the Republicans will be in charge. And, payback is a bitch!
Why, you ask, did we not include the scandal of Benghazi? We will and think it deserves particular special attention because it was not only fatal for four brave Americans, but because it is the first time known in which the U.S. military was ordered to stand down and leave Americans to die on the field of battle, no effort even being made to protect them . . . but, we’re “looking” for the “killers” says Mr. Obama.
Most amazing is that Obama apologists, comical as most are, excuse all of these incidents as “bad management,” or “ineptness,” or simple “incompetence.” The critics charge venal causes. Frankly, incompetence is worse because venality suggests a systematic scheme at least controllable and predictable. Incompetence suggests randomness and recklessness, a sort of Chaos Theory in which results are totally unpredictable and often uncontrollable.