Senator Elbert Guillory, Inspiring . . .

Here, we bring you Senator Elbert Guillory of Louisiana who explains why he has abandoned the party of Jim Crow and more importantly, draws the distinctions clearly between the political parties and their philosophies.

Posted in Senator Guillory | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Dr. Walter Williams is a MUST READ! 20 brilliant comments . . .

John Hawkins on Townhall has served a public purpose:

Walter Williams is a veteran, a professor of economics at George Mason University, a syndicated columnist, a fill-in host for Rush Limbaugh and an author of eight books. Williams has one of the finest minds in America as you’re about to see as you read these quotations.

20) How many times have we heard “free tuition,” “free health care,” and free you-name-it? If a particular good or service is truly free, we can have as much of it as we want without the sacrifice of other goods or services. Take a “free” library; is it really free? The answer is no. Had the library not been built, that $50 million could have purchased something else. That something else sacrificed is the cost of the library. While users of the library might pay a zero price, zero price and free are not one and the same. So when politicians talk about providing something free, ask them to identify the beneficent Santa Claus or tooth fairy.

19) During the first Reagan administration, I participated in a number of press conferences on either a book or article I’d written or as a panelist in a discussion of White House public policy. On occasion, when the question-and-answer session began, I’d tell the press, “You can treat me like a white person. Ask hard, penetrating questions.” The remark often brought uncomfortable laughter, but I was dead serious. If there is one general characteristic of white liberals, it’s their condescending and demeaning attitude toward blacks.

18) Legality alone is no guide for a moral people. There are many things in this world that have been, or are, legal but clearly immoral. Slavery was legal. Did that make it moral? South Africa’s apartheid, Nazi persecution of Jews, and Stalinist and Maoist purges were all legal, but did that make them moral?

17) Households earning $250,000 and above account for 25 percent, or $1.97 trillion, of the nearly $8 trillion of total household income. If Congress imposed a 100 percent tax, taking all earnings above $250,000 per year, it would bring in about $1.9 trillion. That would keep Washington running for 190 days, but there’s a problem because there are 175 more days left in the year.The profits of the Fortune 500 richest companies come to $400 billion. That would keep the government running for another 40 days, to mid-July.

America has 400 billionaires with a combined net worth of $1.3 trillion. If Congress fleeced them of their assets, stocks, bonds, yachts, airplanes, mansions and jewelry, it would get us to at least late fall.The fact of the matter is there are not enough rich people to come anywhere close to satisfying Congress’ voracious spending appetite.

16) I don’t blame only politicians. For the most part, they’re only the instruments of a people who have growing contempt for our Constitution. You say, “Hold it, Williams. Now you’ve gone too far!” Check it out. How many votes do you think a James Madison-type senatorial candidate would get if his campaign theme was something like this: “Elect me to office. I will protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. Because there’s no constitutional authority for Congress spending on the objects of benevolence, don’t expect for me to vote for prescription drugs for the elderly, handouts to farmers and food stamps for the poor. Instead, I’ll fight these and other unconstitutional congressional expenditures.” I’ll tell you how many votes he’ll get: It will be Williams’ vote, and that’s it.

15) Three-fifths to two-thirds of the federal budget consists of taking property from one American and giving it to another. Were a private person to do the same thing, we’d call it theft. When government does it, we euphemistically call it income redistribution, but that’s exactly what thieves do — redistribute income.

14) If we look to benefits only, we’ll do darn near anything because there’s always a benefit. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported that there were 43,443 highway fatalities in 2005. If we had a maximum speed law of 15 mph, the death toll wouldn’t be nearly as high, probably not even as high as 500. You say, “Williams, that’s a crazy idea!” You’re right, but let’s not call it crazy; it’s more accurate to say: saving some 43,000 lives aren’t worth the cost and inconvenience of a 15 mph speed limit.

13) The last election campaign featured great angst over the loss of manufacturing jobs. The number of U.S. manufacturing jobs has fallen, but it has little to do with outsourcing and a lot to do with technological innovation — and it’s a worldwide phenomenon. During the seven years from 1995 through 2002, Drezner notes, U.S. manufacturing employment fell by 11 percent. Globally, manufacturing jobs fell by 11 percent. China lost 15 percent of its manufacturing jobs, and Brazil lost 20 percent. But guess what. Globally, manufacturing output rose by 30 percent during the same period. Technological progress is the primary cause for the decrease in manufacturing jobs.

12) A more insidious effect of minimum wages, as racists everywhere know, is that it lowers discrimination costs. Say a white and a black were equally productive and an employer prefers white workers to black workers. Since he has to pay $9 an hour no matter whom he hires, the cost of discriminating against the black worker is zero. But if it were legal for the black worker to offer a lower price, there’d be a cost to discrimination.

11) Many law professors, and others who hold contempt for our Constitution, preach that the Constitution is a living document. Saying that the Constitution is a living document is the same as saying we don’t have a Constitution. For rules to mean anything, they must be fixed. How many people would like to play me poker and have the rules be “living?” Depending on “evolving standards,” maybe my two pair could beat your flush.

10) The human experience should have taught us that just getting rid of a particular dictatorship is only half the struggle. We must always ask what’s going to replace it.

9) You say, “Williams, you’re just old-fashioned and out of touch with modern society.” Maybe so, but I think that a society’s first line of defense is not the law but customs, traditions and moral values. These behavioral norms — transmitted by example, word of mouth, religious teachings, rules of etiquette and manners — represent a body of wisdom distilled over the ages through experience and trial and error. They include important legal thou-shalt-nots — such as shalt not murder, steal, lie or cheat — but they also include all those civilities one might call ladylike or gentlemanly behavior. Police officers and courts can never replace these social restraints on personal conduct. At best, laws, police and the criminal justice system are a society’s last desperate line of defense.

8) The civil rights struggle is over, and it has been won. At one time, black Americans did not have the same constitutional protections as whites. Now, we do, because the civil rights struggle is over and won is not the same as saying that there are not major problems for a large segment of the black community. What it does say is that they’re not civil rights problems, and to act as if they are, leads to a serious misallocation of resources

7) Maybe your college professor taught that the legacy of colonialism explains Third World poverty. That’s nonsense as well. Canada was a colony. So were Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong. In fact, the richest country in the world, the United States, was once a colony. By contrast, Ethiopia, Liberia, Tibet, Sikkim, Nepal and Bhutan were never colonies, but they are home to the world’s poorest people.

6) People who denounce the free market and voluntary exchange, and are for control and coercion, believe they have more intelligence and superior wisdom to the masses. What’s more, they believe they’ve been ordained to forcibly impose that wisdom on the rest of us. Of course, they have what they consider good reasons for doing so, but every tyrant that has ever existed has had what he believed were good reasons for restricting the liberty of others.

5) In general, presidents and congressmen have very limited power to do good for the economy and awesome power to do bad. The best good thing that politicians can do for the economy is to stop doing bad. In part, this can be achieved through reducing taxes and economic regulation, and staying out of our lives.

4) Poverty in Egypt, or anywhere else, is not very difficult to explain. There are three basic causes: People are poor because they cannot produce anything highly valued by others. They can produce things highly valued by others but are hampered or prevented from doing so. Or, they volunteer to be poor.

3) What’s just has been debated for centuries, but let me offer you my definition of social justice: I keep what I earn and you keep what you earn. Do you disagree? Well, then, tell me how much of what I earn belongs to you – and why?

2) Suppose I hire you to repair my computer. The job is worth $200 to me and doing the job is worth $200 to you. The transaction will occur because we have a meeting of the mind. Now suppose there’s the imposition of a 30 percent income tax on you. That means you won’t receive $200 but instead $140. You might say the heck with working for me — spending the day with your family is worth more than $140. You might then offer that you’ll do the job if I pay you $285. That way your after-tax earnings will be $200 — what the job was worth to you. There’s a problem. The repair job was worth $200 to me, not $285. So it’s my turn to say the heck with it. This simple example demonstrates that one effect of taxes is that of eliminating transactions, and hence jobs.

1) Here’s Williams’ roadmap out of poverty: Complete high school; get a job, any kind of a job; get married before having children; and be a law-abiding citizen. Among both black and white Americans so described, the poverty rate is in the single digits.

Posted in 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, 3rd Amendment, Capitalism, Discrimination, Foreign POlicy, Free Markets, Government excess, In the "Mainstream", Internal Revenue Service, Liberalism, Media Bias, Minimum Wage, Minimum Wages, Progressivism, Socialism | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Joe Biden. Bite-me Buffoon!

Not only is Joe Biden a buffoon, who with “characteristic  hyperbole” is wrong, Al Gore wasn’t elected president, but he blathered on to praise Gore for accepting the Supreme Court’s decision:

“I can’t think of very many who would put his country first like that, at a really, really, really difficult time,” he said. “There’s an awful lot of folks Al and I both know who have run for president and still haven’t gotten over it.”

First, what was his choice, a coup?  I thought he represented the party of peace!

Second, in an all too common display of ignorance, “Bite-me” appears unaware of Richard Milhouse Nixon, then Vice President of these United States, who declined to challenge in the courts the election of John Fitzgerald Kennedy whose election was secured by the well documented votes of the dead in Texas and Illinois in the closest election in our history.

Finally, to add insult to injury, the New York Slimes and Washington comPost paid millions of dollars to count and recount the ballots in Floriduh and, to their utter and complete (as in call suicide prevention!) disappointment, George Walker Bush won every single recount, hanging chads be damned. And who the hell is Chad and how hung is he!!??

Posted in 2016 Election, In the "Mainstream", Joe Biden | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

We Bring You the Leader of the “Free” World

This is the man you elected to be President of The United States of America, a job title that barely presumes to inform its duties. It takes confident, bold, compassionate, fearless leadership, steely resolve if you will.

Oh, by the way, it begs for superior communication skills and certainly a facility for quick, even spontaneous responses to crises . . . That’s NOT THIS GUY!

Posted in Barack Hussein Obama, In the "Mainstream" | Leave a comment

It’s Bush’s Fault!

Whatever the problem, he’s the source!

Posted in 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, 3rd Amendment, Barack Hussein Obama, Benghazi, Capitalism, Climate Change, Discrimination, Fast & Furious, Foreign POlicy, Global Warming, Government excess, Gun Control, In the "Mainstream", Internal Revenue Service, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Kathleen Sebelius, Liberalism, Minimum Wage, Obama Scandals, Obamacare, Progressivism, Sexual Assault, Socialism, Taxation, The Affordable Care Act | Leave a comment

OK, we finally concede. There are NO DEATH PANELS under OBAMACARE! Update

Instead, there is simply the Angel of Death, Good Christian, Good Catholic, Ms. Kathleen Sebelius. It’s pitiful and sacrilegious that she embraces abortion, the horrible end to the most vulnerable among us. But now she refuses, stubbornly, to aid a 10 year-old girl, sentenced to death by fate . . . Kathleen Sebelius, the one woman death panel . . .

In an extraordinarily swift ruling from U.S. District Court Judge Michael M. Baylson in Philadelphia, Kathleen Sebelius has been ordered to add 10 year-old Sara Murnaghan to the adult lung transplant list and allow her a chance to live. It appears that Sebelius merely considered Sara’s impending demise to be a “late-term abortion.” We should hope that it becomes the norm for fast acting judges to overrule Obamacrats . . .

Would that a judge had ordered the White House to try and save our ambassador and his three comrades in Benghazi . . . late term abortions all three . . .

Posted in Barack Hussein Obama, Government excess, In the "Mainstream", Kathleen Sebelius, Obama Scandals, Obamacare | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Frank Lautenberg, R.I.P.

Yes, we mean it! Rot in Purgatory!  Lautenberg was the epitome of an ugly ruthless totalitarian.  He gleefully smeared any opponent, at any time, on any subject dare they vary from his “Progressive” posture. He defended the indefensible, advanced the irrational, and just wasn’t a nice fellow.

Posted in Capitalism, In the "Mainstream", Liberalism, Progressivism | Tagged | 1 Comment

Exempt Status and Campaign Finance

For those with more than idle curiosity, here is a more detailed discussion of the intersection of Exempt Status and Politics published  five years ago by CCH:

CCHFederaltaxationofthepoliticalprocessREV2col82108

While it barely scratches the surface of Congressional noodling, it does give one pause.  What a rat’s breakfast this is.  When you hear “Progressives” and “Liberals” and Democrats whine and wail about the Koch Brothers and Crossroads and Karl Rove, keep in mind that Democrats wrote these laws principally to aide their Union thug friends and other like-minded true believers.

Perhaps the best punishment of the I.R.S. and Obama Administration miscreants would be to eliminate all but 501(c)(3) status and assure that it is enforced one hundred percent, in full, all of the time for education institutions, charities, including the arts, and most important, churches.

Posted in Capitalism, Debates, Discrimination, Government excess, In the "Mainstream", Internal Revenue Service, Liberalism, Media Bias, Obama Scandals, Progressivism, Taxation | Leave a comment

The Obama Scandals for Dummies

Let’s review the Obama scandals in terms that “Progressives,” “Liberals,” and even Democrats can grasp.

Fast and Furious was the first major scandal, still unresolved.  It was a plan, hatched by senior Justice Department leaders.  The plot was to use straw buyers to purchase lethal weapons, assault rifles if you will, from gun dealers in Arizona and track how they then move through the underground world into Mexican drugs gangs south of the border.  But, Justice lost track of the guns, the transporters and the entire hair-brained scheme.  The result was U.S. Government supplied killing tools falling into the hand of Mexican supplied killing machines, the deaths of countless Mexicans and the confirmed death of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.

Obama apologists, who have their work cut out, argue that “the Bush Administration did the same thing,” the fourth grader rationale that no parent would accept. And, the Bush Administration did no such thing. It did run a sting, after consulting with the Mexican Government, it never lost track of the guns, not one of them crossed the border, no one was killed or even injured, and it resulted in felony arrests and convictions.  In other words, Bush did it right with success while Obama did it wrong with grave consequences.

The Associated Press phone records case, a clear violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution is deeply troubling.  The Justice Department and its tools at the Federal Bureau of Investigation through the use of artifice and deceptions secretly tapped twenty phone lines dedicated for use by A.P.  reporters in the Capital to communicate privately with their offices, colleagues and most importantly, their “sources” from whom they gain confidential information under the belief that said disclosures are protected, will remain private and about which the reporters cannot be made to divulge sources.

The First Amendment reads so clearly that even Mr. Obama should be able to understand its proscription:  Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (Emphasis added.)

The James Rosen and FoxNews case although separate from the A.P. case is as serious and more.  In this case, Justice filed a false affidavit in a Federal Court alleging that reporter James Rosen was a “co-conspirator” and a “flight-risk” which convinced the judge to issue a subpoena and allow Justice to delve into the private emails and phone records of not just Mr. Rosen, but even his parents!  This is truly chilling: Mr. Obama, in pursuit of dubious goals, will lie to a Federal Judge to smite his perceived enemies, in this case, a free and open “fair and balanced” press. The difference between the United States and virtually every other country is an aggressive, free press to assure transparency and participative democracy.  Mr. Obama and Vladimir Ilyich Lenin disagree.

The Exempt Organization Division of The Internal Revenue Service, a body of which we have considerable personal knowledge. In this case, Mr. Obama’s apparatchiks systematically denied or delayed lawful recognition of tax exempt organizations through what we call, “The pernicious power of the red check mark.”  Federal bureaucrats have enormous power to confuse, crush and even destroy citizens, often without meaningful review or appeal.  Thus, they must be scrupulous in their administration of the laws Congress enacts. In this case, through a systematic scheme organizations on the right side of the political spectrum (not to mention the right side of the issues) were denied directly or indirectly to participate in the system as left leaning groups do merely for their political persuasions.  The Obama I.R.S. asked unlawful questions, harassed through expensive unlawful document demands, and deliberately delayed or prevented groups from benefitting from the laws similarly situated left wing groups enjoy. The I.R.S. asked such bizarre and unlawful questions as “What was the content of your prayers “from groups that had a religious substance.  Again, in violation of the First Amendment which guarantees that the “Congress shall make no law establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . . “

Under former Exempt Organization Division Director Ira Cohen and his deputy, Marty Slate, both left-wing bureaucrats, the division operated with neutrality. Their successors managed the division similarly. Only under Mr. Obama has E.O. violated basic fair dealing. To compound the matter and suggest political chicanery, the I.R.S. Commissioner, Democrat Douglas Shulman visited the White House 157 times in a little more than two years. In contrast, his predecessor in four years visited once because the I.R.S. is supposed to be independent and non-political.

We worked for Presidents Reagan and George Herbert Walker Bush and visited the White House probably 60 or 70 times even while our mother worked directly for THE President, Mr. Reagan. Two visits were official, once to be appointed to The President’s Commission on the Future of the Steel Industry; and a second time to receive an award (including $10,000) from the President for superior service on said commission.

While Fast and Furious was an abomination, the other three scandals should chill even Democrats. If this is the new normal – much like 14% unemployment is our standard – soon the Republicans will be in charge. And, payback is a bitch!

Why, you ask, did we not include the scandal of Benghazi?  We will and think it deserves particular special attention because it was not only fatal for four brave Americans, but because it is the first time known in which the U.S. military was ordered to stand down and leave Americans to die on the field of battle, no effort even being made to protect them . . . but, we’re “looking” for the “killers” says Mr. Obama.

Most amazing is that  Obama apologists, comical as most are, excuse all of these incidents as “bad management,” or “ineptness,” or simple “incompetence.”  The critics charge venal causes. Frankly, incompetence is worse because venality suggests a systematic scheme at least controllable and predictable.  Incompetence suggests randomness and recklessness, a sort of Chaos Theory in which results are totally unpredictable and often uncontrollable.

Posted in 1st Amendment, Barack Hussein Obama, Benghazi, Fast & Furious, Government excess, Gun Control, In the "Mainstream", Internal Revenue Service, Liberalism, Media Bias, Obama Scandals, Progressivism, Socialism | Leave a comment

Sports, a metaphor for Barry . . .

He can’t pitch a baseball, in his Mom jeans. He can’t shoot a basketball in his tidy whities. And, he can’t throw a football. The man throws bricks. … in all that he does.

Posted in Liberalism | Leave a comment