Trayvon Martin is still dead . . . and Zimmerman will breath fresh air soon . . .

We’ve watched most of the trial of George Zimmerman so you wouldn’t have to.  Tayvon Martin, the “child” to hear the prosecution tell it, is dead.  The State’s attempt to resurrect Trayvon failed, much as its case has failed.  Many observers have excused the State’s poor performance with, “they did the best they could with bad facts.”

Respectfully, the State overreached and overcharged, and even with an aggressive team including a judge who despises the defendant, they have failed to prove the case that they brought.  They brought the charges based on the facts they chose to advance, they failed to take the facts to a Grand Jury and allow 23 common citizens to see the evidence and hear their theory of a crime and posit whether the case merited “murder” versus a lesser charge of man-slaughter or aggravated assault. Coupled with support from the ignoramuses Barry Hussein Soetoro Obama and Eric the ‘Dumb’ Holder the State made hash of Trayvon’s memory.  The State is not a victim of bad facts. It is a victim of racial politics, political correctness, and above all fear.

Posted in 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, Barack Hussein Obama, Discrimination, Government excess, In the "Mainstream" | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“White Hispanics” Vow to Riot

In a stunning turn of events, the “White Hispanic” community, identified by The New York Times as being one George Zimmerman, has vowed to riot if convicted of murder in Floriduh.  Zimmerman, through his civic leader, Snow White, warned that the community won’t be safe, cars will burn, homes will burn, and grocery stores and liquor stores will burn as well, after they’ve been looted, of course, and a few rapes and some buggery will be thrown in to show displeasure with the verdict.

Oh wait, that didn’t happen! It was the black communities in Seminole County and beyond threatening violence if Mr. Zimmerman is acquitted, the likelihood since the State has overcharged and failed to produce evidence “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

So, when the Pistons win the NBA Championship, burning Detroit – not an all together bad idea – is the “celebration” of choice, not unlike losing a jury trial and destroying their own crib by choice.

We say, Let Them. See we are “pro-choice.”

Posted in Discrimination, Gun Control, In the "Mainstream", Liberalism, Media Bias, Progressivism | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Wendy Davis and her “Progressive” Thugs

Much has been written and said – almost all positive – about Wendy Davis, the Texas legislator who shut down the Texas biennial legislative session with her filibuster to prevent passage of a law to prevent the likes of the recently convicted murderer, Kermit Gosnell from preying on Texas’ women seeking abortions. Because no issue unites the mainstream press like the desire to take innocent life, nearly all of the coverage is positive, extremely positive in fact, bordering on creepy. Of course, she cheated and catheterized herself, wore her neat pink sneaks, and leaned on the podium. Senator Rand Paul employed none of that. He stood, like a man, and filibustered for 13 hours, three hours longer.

What is ignored are the issues at hand, the real consequences of the law that will pass in a Special Session call by Governor Perry.  Ms. Davis and her acolytes described by their actions here argue, no, they lie and claim that the law would shutter nearly all the abortion houses of horror throughout the state.

In fact, it would do three things essentially: It would require abortion clinics to upgrade to medical facility standards which are appropriate for rhinoplasty, colonoscopies, and other common medical procedures. Surely having a baby rent from a womb is as serious as giving a nose job! Second, abortion clinics would have to be located within 30 miles of an accredited hospital, again, to protect the abortive mother in the event of complications like those who led to the revelation of Dr. Gosnell’s murderous adventures. And finally, abortions after five months would be banned except in the cases of rape, incest or the mother’s health – a loophole to drive through indeed.

Each of these elements are practiced today in Western Europe, the area of the universe we are told by “Progressives” is the center of the same.

Only in America can a group of Republicans and Conservatives act aggressively to protect the health of young women and their viable unborn infants and be cited for a “A War on Women” when, in fact, it is “Progressives” who have no regard for human life, women, children or themselves. They, the “Progressives,” are at war against most things decent.

It is something to think about my “Progressive” friends. Learn the facts, analyze them in context and stop vilifying everyone who dares to think differently or reach different conclusions form the same fact patterns.

 

Posted in In the "Mainstream", Liberalism, Media Bias, Progressivism, Socialism | Tagged | Leave a comment

We Celebrate NOT the Fourth of July, but our INDEPENDENCE!

This brief read changed the world, and the brave signers sacrificed beyond description, not so that we can go to the mall or roast weenies! Rather, than gave their wealth, their honor and in many cases, their lives so we can enjoy the self-evident truths never before freely enjoyed by mankind:

Thirteen United States of America

In Congress, July 4, 1776

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and, when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them, and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing, with manly firmness, his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining, in the mean time, exposed to all the dangers of invasions from without and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies, without the consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the military independent of, and superior to, the civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops
among us;

For protecting them, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states;

For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world;

For imposing taxes on us without our consent;

For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury;

For transporting us beyond seas, to be tried for pretended offenses;

For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries, so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these colonies;

For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments;

For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation, and tyranny already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow-citizens, taken captive on the high seas, to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.

He has excited domestic insurrection among us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions.

In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms; our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have we been wanting in our attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them, from time to time, of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity; and we have conjured them, by the ties of our common kindred, to disavow these usurpations which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too, have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity which denounces our separation, and hold them as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

WE, THEREFORE, the REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in General Congress assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name and by the authority of the good people of these colonies solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that, as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

 

[Signed by] JOHN HANCOCK [President]

New Hampshire
JOSIAH BARTLETT,
WM. WHIPPLE,
MATTHEW THORNTON.

Massachusetts Bay
SAML. ADAMS,
JOHN ADAMS,
ROBT. TREAT PAINE,
ELBRIDGE GERRY

Rhode Island
STEP. HOPKINS,
WILLIAM ELLERY.

Connecticut
ROGER SHERMAN,
SAM’EL HUNTINGTON,
WM. WILLIAMS,
OLIVER WOLCOTT.

New York
WM. FLOYD,
PHIL. LIVINGSTON,
FRANS. LEWIS,
LEWIS MORRIS.

New Jersey
RICHD. STOCKTON,
JNO. WITHERSPOON,
FRAS. HOPKINSON,
JOHN HART,
ABRA. CLARK.

Pennsylvania
ROBT. MORRIS
BENJAMIN RUSH,
BENJA. FRANKLIN,
JOHN MORTON,
GEO. CLYMER,
JAS. SMITH,
GEO. TAYLOR,
JAMES WILSON,
GEO. ROSS.

Delaware
CAESAR RODNEY,
GEO. READ,
THO. M’KEAN.

Maryland
SAMUEL CHASE,
WM. PACA,
THOS. STONE,
CHARLES CARROLL
of Carrollton.

Virginia
GEORGE WYTHE,
RICHARD HENRY LEE,
TH. JEFFERSON,
BENJA. HARRISON,
THS. NELSON, JR.,
FRANCIS LIGHTFOOT LEE,
CARTER BRAXTON.

North Carolina
WM. HOOPER,
JOSEPH HEWES,
JOHN PENN.

South Carolina
EDWARD RUTLEDGE,
THOS. HAYWARD, JUNR.,
THOMAS LYNCH, JUNR.,
ARTHUR MIDDLETON.

Georgia
BUTTON GWINNETT,
LYMAN HALL,
GEO. WALTON.

Posted in Liberalism | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Criminals: Listen Up!

We are posting this USA Today Opinion column by Gabby Giffords on the off chance that Jared Lee Loughner and other criminally insane shooters – not to mention your everyday common gun wielding thugs – will read it here. Ms. Giffords is under the impression that if she appeals ever more frequently to the Jet Setters who read USA Today and the New York Times laid at their hotel room door, gun violence will decrease.

We know that preventing crazies and criminals from gun possession is a better tool, so we appeal to you, our readers to spread the word.

Posted in 2nd Amendment, 3rd Amendment, Government excess, Gun Control, In the "Mainstream", Liberalism, Progressivism, The Constitution | Tagged | Leave a comment

Some People are too Damned OLD . . .

To do what they doing or hope to do . . .

Posted in Government excess, Hillary Clinton, In the "Mainstream", Liberalism, Progressivism, Socialism | Leave a comment

Secretary of State John Kerry is “nuanced”

Nuance, adj. and in this case a synonym for BUFFOON!

As Bugs Bunny would say, and he’d be a better Secretary of State than Mr. Kerry, “What a Maroon!”

Posted in John Kerry, Liberalism, Progressivism | Tagged | Leave a comment

As we near Record High Temperatures . . .

Let us keep in mind as we near new recorded highs, that they are preceded by “old” recorded highs, and, like all records, will be succeeded by . . . drum roll please, yes, you guessed it, new recorded highs . . .

Our environmental-wacko friends, CHILL!

 

 

 

 

Posted in weather | Tagged | Leave a comment

Progressives and the “N” word

In what is truly an example of picking the low-hanging fruit, Larry Elder ponders why Al Sharpton and Bill Maher are not disciplined for use of the “N” word and the “C” word frequently, publicly and recently.

It’s clearly because in the Democrat party, salacious behavior, lewd acts, vulgar crude language, degradation of women, despoilment of children, and general inhumanity, are rewarded with adulation and votes! Their ugly behavior, among the Democrat faithful is a resume enhancer!

Examples range from former Congressman Gerry Studds earning the applause and adulation of his caucus (don’t go there!) for bedding teenage boys, to Anthony Weiner humiliating his pregnant wife while sharing photos of his little privates with teenage girls.  And in a colossal display of Democrat’s mores,  behold the immortalized Ted Kennedy who merely drown a woman to gain entry to the Democrat Hall of Fame.

Yes, it’s beyond traditional political hypocrisy, it would not be allowed from Conservatives, and Conservatives, in possessing some honor in fact discipline their own.

Posted in In the "Mainstream", Liberalism, Progressivism, Sexual Assault, Socialism | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Voting Rights and the cynical “Progressive” Movement (updated)

With attribution to James Taranto of the Best of the Web at The Wall Street Journal, we refer you to an adult discussion of the decision from the Supremes striking Section IV of the Voting Rights Act of 1965:  Note the cynical abuse and how “Progressives” prey upon ignorance, Black Americans as their sharp instruments:

If you are a well-informed observer of the U.S. Supreme Court, here’s what you probably know about yesterday’s ruling in Shelby County v. Holder: Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits discriminatory voting practices and authorizes private parties and the Justice Department alike to challenge them in court, remains the law of the land.

The ruling affected Section 5, which forbids certain states and localities from making any changes in electoral rules–including but not limited to legislative redistricting, changes in voting machines and establishment of identification requirements–without prior approval from the Justice Department or a panel of federal judges.

If you’re following very closely, you know that Section 5 also remains the law of the land. The provision the high court held unconstitutional was Section 4, which establishes a formula for determining which jurisdictions are covered under Section 5. The problem with Section 4 was that its factual findings were ridiculously outdated. It mandates discrimination against states and local jurisdictions based on registration and turnout statistics from 1972 and earlier years.

Congress could enact a law replacing Section 4 and bringing the preclearance criteria up to date. The conventional wisdom is that that won’t happen any time soon, since Republicans have the majority in the House and Democrats in the Senate.

Roll Call’s Emma Dumain notes that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor has expressed interest in rewriting Section 4. Even so, this column is in agreement with the conventional wisdom. Democrats, as cynical exploiters of black racial fear, have no interest in constructive action here.

Parochial concerns as well as partisan ones could make compromise difficult. “As the Chief Justice noted in oral argument in Shelby County, the state with the largest gap between white and black voter turnout is Massachusetts,” The Wall Street Journal observes in an editorial. Would Elizabeth Warren vote for a new definition that stigmatized the Bay State as a practitioner of Jim Crow?

But even if you’ve been following the matter closely, there’s something you probably think you know that isn’t so: that by striking down Section 4, the court has effectively abolished preclearance. “The decision did not strike down Section 5, but without Section 4, the later section is without significance,” writes Adam Liptak, the New York Times’s Supreme Court correspondent. “So pre-clearance of voting rights changes is still constitutional–but right now no jurisdiction is subject to it,” claims Salon’s Joan Walsh. National Review’s John Fund agrees that Shelby County means “the demise of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.”

While Liptak and Fund are technically correct, Walsh is dead wrong. Let’s let Lyle Denniston of ScotusBlog.com set the record straight:

There is another provision of the law, potentially a back-up (Section 3), that allows the government to go to court to ask that a new state or local government be put under Section 5 because of its more recent history in dealing with minority voters. Two states have been brought under Section 5 that way–Arkansas and New Mexico–along with several county governments, including Los Angeles County in California. The Court’s main opinion did not even mention Section 3, but the dissenters referred to it briefly as a “bail-in mechanism” that has worked. If a challenger now seeks to employ that provision, it presumably will have to show that bias is still a present-day problem there.

In a 2010 Yale Law Journal article, Travis Crum called Section 3 “The Voting Rights Act’s secret weapon,” one that “the academic literature has ignored”:

Commonly called the bail-in mechanism or the pocket trigger, section 3 authorizes federal courts to place states and political subdivisions that have violated the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments under preclearance. . . . Designed to trigger coverage in “pockets of discrimination”21 missed by section 5’s formula [sic; the formula is actually defined in Section 4], section 3 was included in the original Voting Rights Act.

Preclearance under Section 3 does not suffer from the constitutional infirmity that doomed Section 4. It requires a contemporary factual finding of discrimination, either a decision by a judge or an acknowledgment by the defendant jurisdiction. That is to say that even absent congressional action, preclearance remains among the tools available to the Justice Department and voting-rights advocates. They just have to prove their case before using it.

Posted in Barack Hussein Obama, Discrimination, Government excess, In the "Mainstream", Liberalism, Progressivism, The Constitution, The state of the States | Tagged , | Leave a comment