The popular meme among mainstream “Journalists” and Democrats, but, I repeat myself, is that the (love) Strzok texts with Page are their personal political expressions, to which we are all entitled, and there is no evidence that it affected their professional judgments.  That is not what Inspector General Horowitz concluded. A clear reading of the IG’s conclusion is that bias is glaringly obvious, but, there was no evidence available to prove it affected their professional performance.  No smoking gun memo, “Let’s save Hillary.”

How important is bias, evident or perceived? Imagine a young black man, charged with raping a white woman in say, Natchitoches, Mississippi.  During voir dire, the defendant’s lawyer asks a potential juror, “Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the Ku Klux Klan?”  “Well, I was a Grand Kleagle, a recruiter, just like former Democrat Senate Leader Robert Byrd, but, I resigned. I’m good now with Negroes.”

Would a sane person risk the defendant’s life on such an assurance? Would a sentient being conclude that the juror’s judgment would be free of bias? Apparently Democrats will. They are so committed to acquitting Hillary of bad acts and impugning The Donald, that any sense of propriety, sense of justice, any sense of any sense, is a price they’ll gladly sacrifice.

While there are many objectionable things about The Donald, shame on those who reject our jurisprudence, our culture, logic, and decency simply because their flawed candidate lost.

Fortunately for the Donald, his opposition is paving the way for his reelection as they relitigate their mistakes . . .