Surprise! “Progressives” Pursuit of “Gun Control” was PURE POLITICS . . .

Pure dishonesty, or abject stupidity, you decide:

In this piece, Report: Sharp drop in gun violence but most killings involve firearms, WaPo reporter Jerry Markon plays it straight. My “Progressive” friends, most of whom are too lazy to read an entire tract or employ Occam’s Razor should at lest read this:

Newtown thrust gun control to the top of President Obama’s second-term agenda, and the White House pushed hard for a series of gun-control measures. But the effort unraveled under pressure from the gun rights lobby, and every major proposal was rejected on the Senate floor.

The biggest setback for the White House was the defeat of a compromise measure to expand background checks for firearms purchases. Gun-control proponents have since mobilized to revive the push for stricter gun laws, but gun rights groups might seize on one finding in Tuesday’s Justice Department report to argue against enhanced background checks.

Fewer than 1 percent of state prison inmates who possessed a gun when they committed their offense obtained the firearm at a gun show, the report said. Gun shows were central to the measure recently rejected in the Senate: It would have extended the current background-check requirement for firearms purchases from covering only sales at licensed dealerships to any sale that takes place at a gun show or was advertised in print or online.

About 40 percent of state prison inmates obtained their firearms from illegal sources such as theft or through a drug deal, the report said, while 37 percent got their guns from a family member or friend. Those findings are based on data from 2004.

 

This entry was posted in 2nd Amendment, 3rd Amendment, Debates, Gun Control, Liberalism, Media Bias, Progressivism, Socialism and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment