Of the many things there are to dislike about Barry Hussein Soetoro Obama – and there are many – one is his constant use of false options to make an argument. Here, for example, Barry argues that the investigation of the Benghazi slaughter discloses that it resulted not from “intentional” misbehavior by U.S. government officials, but rather, “sloppiness.” This is an argument of a child or a fool.

Intent would suggest Treason.  Sloppiness suggests lack of care.  In between, there is “negligence.” “Common,” typically a misdemeanor or “gross” a felony.  Not one person on planet Earth or wherever Barry thinks he is in the 58 United States has suggested Treason. But certainly this was a case of failing to check a box or file a form on time. This was gross negligence or depraved indifference and someone should be prosecuted. Instead, Barry’s State Department suspended four senior officials with pay. Great . . . a paid vacation before Christmas. Happy shopping.

Of course, the man-child won’t be held accountable any more evidently than he was for turning Senator Daniel Inouye’s memorial service into a paean to himself with 27 references to his personal journey.