In a theme advanced by Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS “Super-PAC” narrators assure that it’s okay to “let President Obama go.” Implicit is the notion that he’s a hail fellow well met but just isn’t quite up to the job.

While the former is rebuttable, the latter isn’t, he has failed in every major way:

If you’re a Conservative, Mr. Obama has assaulted virtually all you hold dear, from loyalty to the Owner’s Manual (that’s the Constitution if you’re drinking too much) to projecting weakness abroad. If you’re a “Progressive” you have to ask, “Are we still at Guantanamo? Are we really killing Americans abroad based on the President’s direct order? What about due process?  What about the rule of law?” And both sides ask, “Why am I paying double what gas cost only four years ago?”

It is abundantly clear that, “Yes it’s okay to let Mr. Obama go.”  Then why the reluctance among so many voters? Very simply, you will be accused of racism as the Associated Press has done here. In a truly tortured construction the AP has concluded that any dissatisfaction with Mr. Obama can only be explained by an increase in white anti-black sentiment, ignoring any other racially inspired sentiments among other peoples’ not of pallor.

Now you know how any employer feels – Conservative or Progressive – when she has to let an under-performing minority, particularly an African-American, go for poor performance. The fear of being called a bigot or worse is palpable. The costs can be dear.

The comfort here is that while you can be sued frivolously at enormous cost for properly letting go an employee, Barry Hussein Soetoro Obama has no recourse against you for your vote. So, “Just do it.”

Oh, and in response to the former? No, he is a petulant, immature, ill-educated man-child, hardly a hail fellow, well met. Mom’s don’t let your daughters marry cowboys or your sons grow up to be one . . . and don’t let your chillins go to Punahou, Occidental College, Columbia University or Harvard law School!