Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, famously argued in Cairo several months ago that the new Egyptian government, the one being crafted by Islamist thugs intent on destroying Israel, and America for that matter (although they are gleefully accepting a gift of $1,500,000,000 of our tax dollars from their “friend,” Barack Hussein Obama) would be wise to pattern its constitution not on the rights and liberties enumerated in ours, The Constitution of The United States of America, but rather the Constitution of South Africa. It apparently is more “nuanced” and allows for greater “penumbra[e] of the interstices,” a dream among those who believe in a “living constitution.”

Now comes New York University’s Ronald Dworkin, in the New York Review of Books supporting Barack Hussein Obama’s ignorant musings on the role of the federal courts:

The prospect of an overruling is frightening. American health care is an unjust and expensive shambles; only a comprehensive national program can even begin to repair it. If the Court does declare the Act unconstitutional, it will have ruled that Congress lacks the power to adopt what it thought the most effective, efficient, fair, and politically viable remedy–not because that national remedy would violate anybody’s rights, or limit anyone’s liberty in ways a state government could not, or would be otherwise unfair, but for the sole reason that in the Court’s opinion the strict and arbitrary language of an antique Constitution denies our national legislature the power to enact the only politically possible national program.

In essence, he’s doing a mind-meld with the President, assuring him that his instincts are right, even if his knowledge isn’t.

These fascists are truly frightening.